Questions About a Proposed New Stillwater Bridge

Stillwater Lift Bridge. High water, Late Summer 2010.

I believe I have made up my mind regarding whether I will support a new bridge crossing the St. Croix River near Stillwater, but I wouldn’t mind hearing some discussion about questions I have about the bridge.

First, I question why anyone in Minnesota would support this bridge other than for altruistic reasons.  Economically it doesn’t seem to make much sense for Minnesotans.

The proposal considered most often has a current price tag of $690 million.  Understanding how these things work and with inevitable delays, the price almost certainly will rise above that estimate.  So we are talking about spending nearly three-quarters of a billion dollars for a bridge that will punch another hole in a natural economic boundary that benefits Minnesota and the Minneapolis/St. Paul metro.

Building this bridge will further dilute the economic core that centers around the Twin Cities by enabling more development in Wisconsin.  Therefore does it make sense for Minnesotans — and Minnesota’s political leaders like Governor Mark Dayton and Senator Amy Klobuchar — to support a new bridge? 

Even in the best of times this does not make a lot of sense, but today we are trying to close a nearly-$6 billion budget gap in Minnesota.  Diluting our state’s tax base, which would be the result of more Minnesota workers moving to Wisconsin, hardly makes sense.  What are the economics supporting a bridge? 

Highway 36

Supporting businesses in downtown Stillwater doesn’t add up.  Literally.  Furthermore, building a bridge a mile south of downtown Stillwater will mainline them onto Highway 36 and right past Stillwater.  People in Stillwater should be careful of what they wish for.  Ask residents in Long Lake, MN, for example, what happened when Highway 12 was re-routed past them.

Second, let’s consider the environment.  A lot of arguments for and against a new bridge focus on what will happen directly at the proposed bridge site, but what happens there is only part of the story.

Activity miles away from a river impact a river.  A river is more than the wide flow of water we cross with bridges, it is the entire watershed.  A river is a system of many rivers, streams, ravines, and groundwater.  Building another bridge across the St. Croix River into Wisconsin will only encourage and accelerate growth.  That is not a good thing…

Sadly, we still are not very good at smart land use planning in this country.  Even as we lose more and more natural resources, especially land, we don’t manage what remains very well.  The very Wild and Scenic Rivers Act was a response to this fact.  The very reason that legislation passed was to ensure that economic interests did not trump the long-term value of precious natural resources.  Now we have a potentially dangerous precedent in making.  If we can ignore the law here, why not elsewhere?

What are the environmental considerations being discussed beyond the river’s banks? 

A multi-lane interstate bridge downriver only a few miles serves west central Wisconsin very well.  Let’s agree that the Stillwater Lift Bridge does not serve Stillwater as well.  The complaints center around traffic problems in downtown Stillwater.  Does that justify building yet another multi-lane bridge across the river?

If the trouble is an aging bridge funneling traffic into the heart of a congested downtown, then shouldn’t the solution be a new bridge that does not do this? 

Luther Dale, chair of the Sierra Club North Star Chapter, proposed a sensible answer to the bridge question and one that I think addresses legitimate concerns I am raising here.  There are legitimate concerns about a “lower and slower” bridge solution like the one Mr. Dale proposes, but again that seems to take into account the impact of a bridge right at the bridge site.  Any new bridge will have impact well beyond the crossing point.

 If we make a mistake here, there is no turning back. 


6 thoughts on “Questions About a Proposed New Stillwater Bridge

  1. MH

    1st off I grew up in Wisconsin and currently Live in Stillwater. I have been stuck on both side of the bridge. 2nd use your eyeballs and take a drive around Stillwater to all the businesses, hospitals, resturants, Menards, fastfood places and count the Wisconsin plates in the parking lots and you will regret any comments stating that it dosen’t make sense for Minnesotan’s to build a new bridge. I do agree that Wisconsin should up there anty but it would destory Stillwater when they shut down the lift bridge for car traffic and make people go to Osceola or Hudson without replacing the bridge which is what’s going to happen soon because the bridge will crumble before they get a new one built. I’m pray for the people and there family’s because they were killed on a structure that is worse then the 35W bridge, I just hope none of my family or friends are on it.

  2. Tour Guide Post author

    MH…I think a bridge putting people on 36 will put them past Stillwater, but I might be wrong. I will stand behind this, however…it makes no sense to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to build a bridge to protect business in Stillwater that already exists (using your eyeballs you see that they are already there) and only amounts to an economic impact of a couple million dollars. Would the private sector spend $690 million to build a bridge to Wisconsin? Doubtful. Economically it makes no sense.

  3. DL

    tour guide, 18,000 cars cross this bridge everyday working their way into the Twin Cities from Wisconsin in order to get too and from work. Picture when during rush hour the bridge collapses with cars sitting on it, what kind of environmental impact are we going to see at that time? Economically, if it was the private sectors responsibility to maintain bridges, we would have had a new bridge a long time ago! The proposed site of this bridge will be next to a powerplant, wastewater treatment plant, Andersen Windows manufacturing facility and the Stillwater Prison, all of which are right on the shores of the river. People driving on this bridge are commuters trying to get through downtown as fast as possible making it hazardous and frustrating for those who go to Stillwater to enjoy the shops and restaurants. Stillwater will not lose its appeal by losing congestion.

  4. Sharon Halligan

    I graduated from SHS in 1957. I can remember looking down on the river from Mr. Ellingson’s class. There was talk then about building a new bridge and it is still not built. I no longer live in MN but come home frequently. I avoid going downtown like the plague. There is no place to park and weekends are worse. You can find excuses to build the bridge or not build the bridge but build the damn bridge before there is a tragedy like I35. Tourists will still come to shop in Stillwater. It is a destination place for a lot of people .

  5. Pingback: St. Croix Bridge Toll « A Little Tour in Yellow

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s